An ongoing record of my attempt to construct a corpus
Key.
A: Corpus. A definitive part of the corpus which embodies both the aesthetic style of Slow Cinema and the conceptual element of my thesis.
B: Influence on Corpus. A film which has either directly or in-directly influenced a film or filmmaker which contributes to my corpus.
C: Peripheral Corpus. A film which has neither been an influence of the corpus nor contains the key aesthetical requirements to be a part of the corpus, yet can fairly be labelled as capturing the spirit of Slow Cinema.
D: Non Corpus. A film made by a filmmaker who is either part of the corpus or has been an influence on the corpus, or even influenced by the corpus yet doesn’t meet enough of the aesthetic requirements to be a part of the previous three groups.
Directed by Sergei Dvortsevoy
Released in 2008
Country of Kazakhstan, Russia, Germany,
Poland, Switzerland and Italy
Reasons for watching: In a post for the Unspoken Cinema blog Tulpan is discussed as an example
of a documentary mode of Slow/Contemplative Cinema along with films such
as Sweetgrass.
Usefulness: The focus of Tulpan is on the peripheral
existence of those living outside of our contemporary western society
and the contrast in lifestyle pace is a recurring narrative theme with
Slow/Contemplative cinema and Tulpan therefore shares this thematic link
with many films I have been looking at. I have however tried to
construct a definition and corpus of films based more on aesthetics and
the style of Tulpan features more handheld moving cameras and dialogue
than the mode of filmmaking I have been outlining. Aesthetically and
formally Tulpan doesn't fit within the criteria I have outlined, yet the
film remains a useful example of a more strictly Bazinian approach of
filmmaking which Slow/Contemplative cinema starts out with before taking
to its extreme end.
Directed by Ben Rivers
Released in 2011
Running Time 88 minutes
Country of Origin UK
Camera Unknown 16mm
Reasons for watching: Ben Rivers is an artist whose work with film has seen him regularly compared with the Slow Cinema oeuvre.
Usefulness: Shot on 16mm, this film may fall outside of my hypothese that the use of Slow aesthetics leads towards the widespread adoption of digital capturing equipment, yet the film is very sparse and as a result of its documentary style recalls histroically Nanok of the North and more recently Sweetgrass or Le Quattro Volte as this film is devoid of a narrative and uses the format of the film to demonstrate the degree to which the unnamed protagonist lives outside of the conventional norm. He is a scavenger who lives through his own resourcefulness and the film draws us into his alternate way of life by inviting us to experience his personal perception of time.
Reasons for watching: Part of the Unspoken Cinema canon of Contemplative Cinema
Usefulness: Whereas some films I have been watching, use slow aesthetics as a
dramatic device to puncture an otherwise faulty generic plot or synopsis
like The Hunter, other films totally abandon narrative devices
altogether. The result is often a character study or a portrait of an
individual which removes dramatic device in favour of focusing solely on
one small idea or moment. Albert Serra's take on Don Quiote is one of
these kinds of films, as dramatic progression is absent. What replaces
drama is a meandering trek through the wilderness by Quixote and his
follower. By adopting this font Serra is able to produce a document of a
wandering nomadic existence. Rather than tell a story about a nomadic
existence. Rivers film Two Years at Sea is in the same mould. One is
never told who the protagonist is, why he lives this life, how long he
has been living like this. In fact there are no words at all. Fragments
of photographs which appear across the screen every now and then may
tell us about a younger version of the character we see, or may be
meaningless. Like Serra's Don Quixote Rivers protagonist is leading a
nomadic existence outside of society's norms and therefore the structure
and form of the film must reflect this in order to underline the
extreme lifestyle of its protagonist.
Reasons for watching: The film was inspired by Bela Tarr. As Tarr is a recurring figure within my corpus any films or filmmakers whose work has been influenced or inspired by Tarr have a degree of relevance to me.
Usefulness: The lack of narrative and recurring images of the films stars (Casey Affleck and Matt Damon) wondering through a remote landscape recalls Albert Serra's film Honor de Cavalleria (Serra, 2006, USA). In my opinion by having recognisable actors the film is easier to watch and is a more curious experience as one doesn't expect the likes of Matt Damon and Casey Affleck to be in such a financially unattractive film. The film does make use of non diegetic music which is rare for Slow Cinema and the score, though rarely used, adds to the films aesthetic make up. The score consists of two pieces of music composed by Arvo Part whose music is very sparse and recalls John Cage in its austere minimalism.
Directed by Bela Tarr Released in 1994 Running Time 450 mins Country of Origin Germany/Switzerland/Austria
Reasons for watching: The film's mammoth length combined
with the status of Bela Tarr and his influence on Slow Cinema makes Satantango an important minimalist film.
In Flanagan's (2008) 'Towards an Aesthetic of Slow in Contemporary Cinema.' Sátántangó is within the canon of films
used to demonstrate just what a cinema of slowness is.
Usefulness: The film, much like Tarr's previous work, uses
extremely slow pans which reveal the geography of the village and characterises the way of life of the villagers inhabitants. Within the film the recurring use of tracking shots following characters walking through the village advances the plot by showing how, and more importantly when they interact. This provides an overview of what has happened over the course of the day that much of the film takes place in. For example in one scene we follow a doctor walk to a public house where he bumps into a young girl walking towards the same pub holding a dead cat. This scene is repeated a few hours later when the story of why the girl is heading to the pub and why she is holding cat is revealed. The role of the long drawn out tracking shots and their overall
lack of speed reflects the length of time individual acts take in this village and forces the viewer to experience the pace that the village operates at.
Reasons for watching: Helen has been written about as a film which is potentially useful to the canon of films I have been developing. In a review for Film Comment Jonathan Romney (2009, p.42) states "the film's measured syntax and visual language are closer to gallery video art than art cinema, but Helen yields echoes of Bresson, Egoyan, and Antonioni"
Usefulness: As a film which could contribute to my canon Helen meets some of the aesthetic criteria I have established. The film does correspond to the cinema of walking Matthew Flanagan describes in his article for 16:9, 'Towards an Aesthetic of Slow Cinema' as there are repetitive scene of the titular character wondering aimlessly through woods in an attempt to become closer to the girl she has been cast in L'Aventura and more recently in a film like Wendy and Lucy. By creating and failing to resolve a suspenseful event narratively Helen is not unique as many film-makers and script writers adopt that mode of Hitchcockian narrative technique, yet by matching the diffused narrative with the minimal aesthetics of slow cinema Helen resembles and has more in common with the films of my Slow Cinema canon.
Reasons for watching: Part of the Unspoken Cinema blogs canon of films.
Usefulness: The film uses more close ups than is commonly for Slow Cinema, but frequently features extended scenes and moments with little or no dialgoue. The young boy who is at the centre of the film is semi-mute and the films sparring of sound brings into focus the preipheral sounds of the rural environment where the film is set. Like the documentary Sweetgrass mentioned elsewhere in this blog, the lack of conversation and dialoge shifts the types of sounds that are given prominence reulsting in a unique sound scape of animal noises, the sounds of villagers and other rural sounds providing the sonic backdrop to the film. The film also avoids using any non-diegetic music which also highlights the diegetic sounds of the film.